<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Appeals Court Discusses Dan Ford&#039;s Conduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobchatelle.net/the-appeals-court-discusses-dan-fords-conduct/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobchatelle.net</link>
	<description>For those concerned about false accusations and wrongful convictions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Dan Fords Unethical Behavior in the Baran Case &#124; Friends of Justice</title>
		<link>http://bobchatelle.net/the-appeals-court-discusses-dan-fords-conduct#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Dan Fords Unethical Behavior in the Baran Case &#124; Friends of Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobchatelle.net/?page_id=368#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] The Court needed to say nothing about prosecutorial misconduct, because no ruling had been made on that issue.  Never the less, they found they had quite a bit to say. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Court needed to say nothing about prosecutorial misconduct, because no ruling had been made on that issue.  Never the less, they found they had quite a bit to say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Elephant Under the Rug &#171; Friends of Justice</title>
		<link>http://bobchatelle.net/the-appeals-court-discusses-dan-fords-conduct#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>The Elephant Under the Rug &#171; Friends of Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobchatelle.net/?page_id=368#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] The Court needed to say nothing about prosecutorial misconduct, because no ruling had been made on that issue.  Never the less, they found they had quite a bit to say. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Court needed to say nothing about prosecutorial misconduct, because no ruling had been made on that issue.  Never the less, they found they had quite a bit to say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

